InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Freddie bagholder

09/16/23 8:08 AM

#768218 RE: navycmdr #768217

Do you not know sandra released yesterday?
icon url

Ace Trader

09/16/23 10:11 AM

#768223 RE: navycmdr #768217

YEP
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

RickNagra

09/16/23 10:40 AM

#768224 RE: navycmdr #768217

Foreshadowing.
icon url

Louie_Louie

09/16/23 1:54 PM

#768239 RE: navycmdr #768217

We're any shares bought or sold at that price? If not, then just a hiccup
icon url

bradford86

09/16/23 6:40 PM

#768253 RE: navycmdr #768217

Looks like someone knows how to inspect element and take a screenshot and you will happily repost their nonsense like it is a positive omen
icon url

chessmaster315

09/16/23 9:50 PM

#768269 RE: navycmdr #768217

Maybe it was not a glitch. Remember, when a stock goes x dividend, it drops by the amount of the dividend.

However, with FNMA if shareholders were awarded an equivilant of $12 per share, that would bring the price to right at $12.63 (plus or minus a couple pennies) If you use 1.1 billion shares, that's damages of around 13 billion.

There would likely be some sort of "x date", that if you owned the shares on the day before "x date" you would get the dividend.

It follows that it was announced that current shareholders would get a 12 dollar dividend on (a date in the future), it would mean the shares were worth 12.00 more if it included this dividend. 'Its all a guess..an unsubstantiated one, but plausible.




Im not sure how much "per share" the price dropped when NWS was announced, but it had to be a whopper of a drop. Talk about disappointing earnings, how much would apple drop if the government announced the confiscation of all APPLe profits from now on? Probably more.
icon url

LuLeVan

09/17/23 6:18 AM

#768278 RE: navycmdr #768217

Primitive Photoshop fake. The price of $12.63 was simply inserted in the screenshot as a typed number. You can recognize the clumsy fake by the fact that "+ $0.01 (0.04%)" is shown below the fake price. If the price were real there should be something like "+ $12.01 (1850%)".

What does the "author" hope to achieve with such nonsense? He only makes a fool of himself.