News Focus
News Focus
icon url

biosectinvestor

03/08/23 11:52 AM

#574355 RE: antihama #574188

I don’t think that is the case at all. They’ve already been incensed for the specials program. I doubt they did not have someone performing the function. But yes, they were not commercial. That’s the whole point at this stage. Of course they were not commercially operating yet, so now that person will be in a role intended to reach a much broader marketplace.
icon url

flipper44

03/08/23 12:52 PM

#574388 RE: antihama #574188

Reviewing matters, I think you are correct. Thanks for the prior link. I doubt they’d advertise for the position this time around if they were not recently told to count on MIA.
icon url

biosectinvestor

03/08/23 1:27 PM

#574397 RE: antihama #574188

Me thinks it's because they weren't ready for prime time last June and they believe they are close now.



I objected to this phrasing. I don't think that is correct. "Not ready for prime time" suggests delinquency. I agree with the later part and think they are moving toward approval of MIA and commercialization in fact, with approval to happen at any moment. So this is the time when you hire that full position for commercialization. Maybe we meant the same thing. But the phrasing I took objection to.
Bullish
Bullish