InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

LCLiving

01/27/23 12:48 PM

#112365 RE: Yolo #112362

You were not correct on the shell because it had not been LEGALLY designated as a shell. You may think a company is BK, but until a judge issues the final order, they would not be BK. Legal definitions matter, unlike opinions.

as for this-

They didn't have to request the restrictive legend be removed for this share cancellation to be filed.



I never said they did, but that is where the adversarial part would come from that others were referring to. It could be a mix of all, and it doesn't make a difference. I see them going bye bye, and that is all that matters.
icon url

vinsterr

01/27/23 1:42 PM

#112397 RE: Yolo #112362

I was right about the report containing both years, I won’t lift my glass to you it seems lol