ditto....I was an election judge back when we had polls
there were generally 3 of us at a table and if someone had a question we could answer it IF they asked 1st
we were NOT allowed to offer instructions or helpful hints outside of repeating instructions unless help was requested..... and what we could say was limited
we used to have ballots like the one you described and before that machines that you could do the individual OR the party line....
on our ballots...you could go the party line OR mark them all it was one or the other but NOT both......
and it was the libtards that made it so damn difficult it wasn't rocket science....
Now when someone came with a question and said I marked the party line AND the candidates, is that ok?
we had to invalidate that ballot....there was a procedure and then get the person another ballot and instruct them
and it was a big hullabaloo making sure rejected ballots didn't get counted.....with signatures and affadavits signed by at least 2 of the judges as long as we were opposing parties....or all 3 could sign if someone wasn't in the john...
we started at 4 a.m. and finished at 3 or 4 a.m. the next day with all the I dotting and T crossing and 90% of the bullshit was caused by the dems
all while we watched them haul in college students who were told to bring a piece of mail and their ID and even if the student said they'd already voted back home they were told to go ahead and vote anyways......
and we damn near had a 1st class riot because I made a stink about it ON THE SPOT....and really pissed some people off
Our friggin RINO county leader had made a deal with the Dem and those damn ballots ended up being counted I learned later and cost us a good state rep at the state level
screw 'em...........crooked bastards
so I didn't find your remark one damn bit funny............
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
