Replies to post #690510 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[soundincrest]

"AZ", so when does this END????????????

[redisnieurt]

Quote: .. The WMI Holding Company', "the debtor" ... WAS NOT THE RELEASED ENTITY' ... "the debtor in possession" ... WAS RELEASED, by those original "releasing" WMI Owners' ... now, the WMIH and the Mr COOPER Groups SEC submissions have explained the entire process ...

The "debtor", and the "debtor in possession" are not separate entities. There are not both a debtor AND a debtor in possession.

There is always a debtor. And that debtor may be in possession (continuing to operate the business).

There is no distinction whatsoever in AZs statement. Because of this, AZs statement is actually FALSE. Because you released the debtor in possession, and because there is no distinction between the debtor in possession and the debtor, you DID in fact release the WMI Holding Company.

[rickstereo3333]

Really simple and direct question....Yes or No will more than suffice.

Will holders of old wmi equity interests, colloquially referred to as "escrows", receive further compensation from the supposed remnants of wamu/wmi?

No timeframe required.