InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Jimmy6969

07/04/21 11:33 AM

#319521 RE: tredenwater2 #319515

He said our "name is "in"" the room for discussion, not that we will be in the room. I thought the same thing as you, but had to re-read.
icon url

nidan7500

07/04/21 11:33 AM

#319522 RE: tredenwater2 #319515

tredenwater2

Bp (fda) trying to wrap their minds around how they got hogtied and come up with a political solution to a multi decade scientific blunder!



Spotted this as the first (other) attempt to manage the process which the FDA obviously has poorly done. They somehow must get the discussion back in the private sector while they (FDA) get back into their objective regulatory body mode. Not clear if this will work or not for them b/c they seem to kind of like being the 900lb gorilla.

In the case of (at least AD-CNS diseases) the FDA trials process has badly failed. IMO, they need to re-engineer and reinvent themselves. They seem to get conflicted and get into trouble when judging the results.
icon url

frrol

07/04/21 1:54 PM

#319534 RE: tredenwater2 #319515

No one will try to "crush us". There's no conspiracy against secretly wonderful biotechs that will make me rich if only they would let it.