I do not agree. Fudsters turn any revelation without the full revelation into fud. I do not agree that saying they were unblinded, but still can’t say anything, changes anything. It’s unlikely they are still blinded, and even if “they” were, which would only be done at this point to not affect some regulatory conversation, hypothetically, no one writing a journal article would still be blinded, in my opinion.
And this is all just speculative. It’s virtually impossible, in my opinion, that they would still be blinded.