InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

helpx

02/22/21 7:40 AM

#53059 RE: Mcol52 #53058

yes a 5/1 r / s would be beneficial. the o / s would be 200m and it will take an increase of the pps to 0.80 $ before r / s
icon url

BNP31

02/22/21 7:44 AM

#53061 RE: Mcol52 #53058

2 years ago, maybe, but Not needed in current market. Has much fatter pigs hitting a buck plus. The correct story and company plans gets us there on this maxed SS. The advantage here is that it is all retail trading, no shares being added so this can run very hard organically before a rs needs to be considered.
icon url

z1z2z3

02/22/21 9:27 AM

#53066 RE: Mcol52 #53058

Yeah, I thought exactly the same, TBH. I was thinking 1:4 minimum. People have no clue about the things you said. I was saying for ALPP to do the same, but the conservative investors ended up voting for just an A/S increase. Way worse in the long term.
icon url

Cat

02/22/21 3:19 PM

#53114 RE: Mcol52 #53058

Lol. In order to generate revenues you need products. Think UATG can sell 12M$ worth of socks? Lol.