Replies to post #223388 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Jetmek_03052]

I fail to see any possible reason for that.

It’s already public information, with the publication of the SEC filing.

Only problem is, I’ll bet most shareholders don’t keep up with SEC filings and therefore don’t even know that the Board denied DBMM’S request for Summary Affirmance of the ID.

There’s no way that informing shareholders with a letter or announcement of the Boards denial of DBMM’s request for Summary Affirmance is illegal.

Is DBMM trying to somehow hide this from shareholders?

[Stock_Barber]

That makes ZERO sense... it is public information! Shareholders of DBMM shouldn't have to dig through the SEC's website to know what is going on!

Can they even afford to pay an attorney to provide advice?