Replies to post #329425 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[exwannabe]

First of all. The FDA at best gives marginal wishy washy buy in. And I do not know of anything that asserts any of the others even provide that much guidance. They will accept an IND change if it does not effect patient safety.

Past that, you are relying on a forward looking statement by NWBO. How many of those have turned out to be wrong? 80% or so?

Can I rely on LG's statement that TLD is in Sep? Possible approval by end or year? Total BS lies by LG. But protected as forward looking.

[BWIS]

I've read it at least twice today now. And probably the first time you posted it.

I don't feel one implies the other or that they couldn't change at any point from the time they said that. If you've run anything you know that things are constantly changing. I feel like your logic is flawed here. In fact LL said they were still blinded as of Friday correct? Or partially blinded. Whatever TF that means?

Look I want you to be 100% correct, but I'm feeling like this is arriving in the middle of a huge pump storm by some of our habitual pump and dumpers. Saying things like this on this board is irresponsible. IMO. and not what a Christian should be doing.

Did you notice Marzan didn't deny selling plenty of nwbo?


Are you saying that if the FDA never responded, NWBO would have never moved forward?

[kfa670]

Why then, will they not update the FDA clinical trials site ?

Across the sea it is the RA responsibility

Here it is the sponsor. (I have no idea in Canada)

Why would they not take this feeble and easy step? Dot these I's and cross these T's to be a real boy company? Be transparent?

MAYBE ITS A SHORT TRAP :-O

Serious question though ATL, you are an integral part of the DD here on this board.