InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bas2020

08/25/20 1:45 PM

#267169 RE: BIOChecker4 #267162

Evidently, the TGA has witnessed and reviewed sufficient safety and potential efficacy data to warrant SAS, for which 75% of SAS drugs were ultimately approved.

Seems the risk of non-approval is quite low.
icon url

Steady_T

08/26/20 1:55 AM

#267287 RE: BIOChecker4 #267162

Everything you say is true. What you seem to be ignoring in your analysis is the bulk of the evidence.

It's not a done deal until a successful P3 trial or the unlikely PA. Having said that there is, as is said in civil trials, a preponderance of evidence that at least one or more trials will be successful.

I suggest that the odds are much better than 50/50 at this point.

The safety record of 2-73 in all trials is much better than most, if not all, CNS drugs and that overcomes many of the hurdles CNS drugs need to overcome for approval.

That alone increases the odds of approval.