InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

IgnoranceIsBliss

05/28/20 8:50 PM

#276824 RE: Bouf #276823

No Bouf, that's not the standard here. The Federal Court of Appeals reviews the case de novo, but with deference to the district court judge's assessment of the facts. There needs to be "clear error" to contradict the district court judge's assessments.

That's why Singer uses that phrase over and over again in the brief.

It IS a retrial -- but with constraints.