I'm not trying to convince you. I have stated why I think a conversion is likely, whether or not anyone here agrees or disagrees is immaterial to me.
What law? Please cite a specific section.
FHFA is absolutely allowed to direct FnF to issue additional shares. But it isn't current common shareholders that would pay for these shares, but new investors.
Again, what law does it break? Your use of the word "taking" implies that your answer would be the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution, but that only covers property taken for public use. New FnF common shares sold to private investors (or created by a junior-to-common conversion) would be for private use, not public, so the Fifth Amendment cannot be your answer.
How does the conversion ratio affect its legality?
Also, remember that the conversion has two variables: the percentage of par and the price per common share. The latter could very well be based on the market's common share price leading up to the conversion, as with Citi, but nothing is stopping FHFA from setting the former wherever it believes best.
What errors are you referring to? Also, as I just said above, the conversion rate will be determined by FHFA as whatever they think is best. FHFA is allowed to act in its own interests, even if it is contrary to the interests of shareholders. Judge Sweeney said that.
Nobody will be asking current common shareholders anything because they have no voice and no power. Also, the conversion does help because it makes the SPO, which Calabria and Mnuchin say is necessary, much easier to conduct.