InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Crow3

11/02/06 8:32 PM

#1108 RE: Crow3 #1107

That is an old trick..calling people Bashers.. I doubt that it is as effective as you evidently hope.
icon url

rrufff

11/03/06 12:39 PM

#1117 RE: Crow3 #1107

Crow - I hate to say you just have reading comprehension problems.

LBWR is my favorite pinkie. I'm one of the moderators on the board.

I've not posted anything on LYJN other than news and my own concerns about the capital structure. I like the concept and have been buying on the way down. But I wouldn't recommend it to anyone until the company clearly backs up its assertions that it isn't diluting and dumping.

My objection to your posts and to those of IVXX were that they were merely opinions masquerading as fact. You have no facts.

You're entitled to voice your opinion but you have provided very little if any detail that comes close to being factual. In fact, almost all your posts would be applicable to virtually every pink penny. Hence the term MGB.

So, let's get off the personal posts, particularly where you seem to have reading comprehension problems.
icon url

rrufff

11/03/06 4:25 PM

#1119 RE: Crow3 #1107

Just to be clear - I don't think I've seen a worse looking chart. It's hard to argue anything other than dilution and dumping, except that the volume has not really been typical of a diluter.

but, again, these are not facts, just opinions.

For those who can't read, I'm not recommending anyone else buy it. I'm treating it as a bottom fish, possible turn-around candidate, for high risk funds. I like the concept but management has no clue how to build a strong shareholder base. Forget the fluff PR's and CD's, particularly if product is not available. Instead, they should Do some insider buying to show that they are in it with the shareholders.