InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Sheepdog

10/19/17 11:22 AM

#78445 RE: Deep6 #78444

The strict answer to that is "NO".



....Nate was already a liar.



icon url

surfkast

10/19/17 8:27 PM

#78447 RE: Deep6 #78444

WOULD NOT ALL THE OTHER FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS COUNT FIRST?
LIKE STARTING WITH THE ORIGINAL FILING?


10-12G Jul 29, 2014

The product is currently sold under the name “Nate’s Homemade.”


WHERE WAS IT SOLD IN MAY 2014?



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The undersigned has hereunto affixed his/her signature at Huntington Beach, CA , this 21st day of May, 2014.

/s/ Nate Steck

Nate Steck


https://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10116626