InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Alan Brochstein

09/19/17 11:04 PM

#16748 RE: EricKnowsBest #16744

That's not a proper interpretation. It does not ever say Novus is related or describe the relation. Since it involves the award of shares to officers and directors, they list the table that just happens to include all shareholders (including Novus).

Read the entire S-1 and find out if Joseph Wade is listed as husband of Anastasia Shishova or as being part of Novus (he is not).

I posted earlier that Novus is the former lender and now Series B owner - this is in the 10-Q. I also showed how they are described as related only now and not previously.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=134735646

There is no doubt that the company failed to disclose these related-party issues.
icon url

penknee

09/19/17 11:26 PM

#16751 RE: EricKnowsBest #16744

Where does it say that Novus is a related party? It doesn't.
icon url

ash111

09/20/17 5:48 AM

#16759 RE: EricKnowsBest #16744

You are right. It crearly mentioned.there is completely no issue.

An R/M between SIGO and Battle Mountain Genetics which The Novus Group had an ownership in Mountain prior the R/M. It's obvios that Novus a related-party.

All legit and SIGO just expanding these days and already generated almost $200k revenues for August alone. Most weed companies which are trading $50m to $150m don't even have sales yet. This alone points of immense undervalued.$3m cap a/o today even if compare it to others including fully dilution ( All other weed stocks will be facing a massive dilution thru Warrants, Options and Convertibale Notes while sigo has a clean balance sheet a/o today, a debt-free.

10Q also out but past 2 months developments will be reflected on upcoming Earnings. Can't wait and loading the gift cheap shares here.