Very accurate except for one thing. The $70m is to get them into initial limited commercialization. The author states they need the $70m to get to submission at the end of 2018. They won't need that much by submission. Thanks again for posting a positive spin on the situation for sure!
Do we know what type of readership this particular article will attract? Is this a prominent site with high-dollar investors who may see the light and dive in? Almost any publicity is beneficial these days... I would have liked to see the article make a brief mention of the new management team, in case readers are familiar with last year's debacle and don't know that this is no longer THAT company.