Thanks for your reply and thoughts. I think you're absolutely right. I think the major reason Li invested in lqmt is to be that Apple supplier. Exciting times ahead !
Li has mentioned the value of the Liquidmetal name. From a marketing standpoint, I would argue there is no better name to introduce the material to the masses. Bulk metallic "glass" implies fragility. "Amorphous" is simply not as catchy. I find it hard to believe that Apple can come up with any better description. Perhaps Li agrees, and predicts (or knows) Apple will use the Liquidmetal name. Only a theory.