Replies to post #34072 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[lbird33]

yet you support Kipping who gave himself 100+million for driving the stock down to .005 was it?

I'm just glad that VPLM, if need be, will have their time in court. Since, really, the patents continue to be the main question here. Nobody on this board has given any reason they wouldn't hold up in court.

[CEOs]

"Re: nyt Post# 34069
VoIP-pal pays Mike Waggitt alleged fraudster and co-conspirator 3,000,000 shares and his cohort Karim Sayani received same for "professional services" as stated in their financials. It appears on Howe street that they are the promoters on VoIP-pal. How many Voip-pal shareholders would like to ask the BOD why they paid out so much for so little. And the stock continues its decline, down to 25% of the value from when they were initially compensated.We as shareholders would like to know. Just our opinion . "

Wait just a minute here. That can't be true. Why would Malak leave himself an opening for Kipping to exploit? If they were promoters like Inza (who is publicly declared), wouldn't the BCSC require the same of them? All investors need now is for the BCSC to find out and we get a cease order Again. Sheesh.