I am not a motor head either but I have heard that some cars have as many as 15 or 20 computer modules that must "talk" to themselves for the vehicle to function as it was engineered to do as the all work in conjunction to regulate the various components that control the operation of the vehicle.
If a VW were to be retrofitted with a CSRV valve system, it seems to me that a total rework of the computer module programming would be required. Don't see how it could be otherwise.
Is this an opportunity for Coates? Could be. I wonder if VW has a "contact us" email portal. Would they listen to the suggested that Coates may have the answer to their problem. You never know. Who will be the first to contact them? Might be me.
VW will pay fines to governments. VW will pay vw car owners. VW will pay in market share. VW will reglas all engine control units (ECU's) to meet epa standards at a further cost of mpg stats and torque/horsepower per ecu reflash. Customers won't b happy and vw will continue to shrink over the next 5 years.
They will absolutely entertain either this clean engine tech and or all other viable options. I do believe this is the best as it can allow them to advertise no oil changes in x amount of years. First motor to completely separate oil from the combustion chamber and so on.
Great opportunity for cote. If I was involved in Coates engineering I'd already be retrofitting a few cars with Coates heads to submit a vs b epa test results. Even if vw doesn't bite the positive p.r. alone would be almost perpetually positive.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
