No, no, no snayeman.
Your totally wrong. There is/was no need for 'azzcovering'.
What I am claiming is that they haven't told us and won't tell us, what the plan is.
Peter did spend a huge amount of money on shares, not piddly.
And it also won't cover their 'azz' in a court of law, there only their actions count.
They cannot benefit down the road if they all bought shares like we did. SEO paid even more than the recent low.
So your attribution is not clearing up anything. Just negativity. It does not make sense what you claim.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
