InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Ready4bluesky

08/07/15 6:24 PM

#38303 RE: sentiment_stocks #38302

Her posts are full of inaccuracies. Reminds me of Pyrr. A lot of BS with a little truth mixed in to give the appearance everything is valid.
icon url

Rkmatters

08/07/15 6:30 PM

#38304 RE: sentiment_stocks #38302

The only part of the German Protocol I saw was for 103 patients on safety for GBM. 12 from the first trial. 18 from the second trial. 73 from the main Ph III. HE was applied separately. Right, Rapids are included, rGBM is not. My quick number, at work. Again my focus was not on where enrollment was at. It was on the 33. No matter, it's only 4, Rapids would be part that 11 patients. I can't change SEC numbers. But I see now why you're so resistant to it.

As for that portion of the protocol you're pointing out to, that's new to me, thanks. Does it relate to safety?

If safety is 73, only change then would be:
73-14 open= 59 - 11 pre-stop= 49 enrolled upon ph II restart for safety.

49 + whatever they enrolled after mid- 2012 = ? enrolled

66 events from there.