Replies to post #42470 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[wlfr01]

I think you hit the nail on the head. I do not think it was by accident that the dead guy went after SFRX after they received the permits for Juno. I have always said, look at old posts, the dead guy knew what was there. "No diving on the logs for the deleted area!" SFRX was on a trail of ballast and material that was leading them to the deleted area.

Go SFRX

[capted]

Boiler99, yes I agree. Nice trusted partners they are not. I hope they hit the main pile there and rub it in their face.

[hedge_fun]

So being operational means reviewing past work?.......Sure

glad I didn't fall for the "come on down to Juno" trick.

Seafarer Exploration did get considerable magnetometer work done on the Juno Site. The data collected to date has given credibility to Seafarer Exploration's belief that the area was indeed deleted of magnetometer hits. The work to date shows a substantial number of magnetometer hits in the blank area where our diving efforts last year were leading Seafarer. Further research into past dive logs that are required by any previous companies diving on the Juno site show no previous diving activity in the deleted area on the magnetometer survey.

Seafarer is operational and next week looks very favorable for continued operations. Seafarer Exploration is a founding member of the National Foundation for Marine Sciences.