My my My you do hate the truth don't you. I deleted your off topic posts and you say nothing happen and give some excuse. I state to tell it all, which you rarely do like limited posting to clean your act up. Then you confirm that you were limited but want to say something about condone ... Whatever.
Now you are screaming .. hey you are the one that refuses to tell the truth. You refuse to even use proper variables in your posts and you state because it will make the company look good because you are selective bias. Then you want to post your Pixs in a promotion off topic again.
Do not get so emotion. Last time was when you could get shares from me and then from the company.
Plus you come under this alias when in fact your Despy and you wanted me to write a term paper for you in the spring of 2000. Anyway under this alias you act like you do not know me at all.
3-28-01 / 849 - So who is the Gary Guy? He the one getting all the shares? Tell him, I wanna work for him if gives some to me.. OK?
But I refused so then you want shares from the company and again was turned down.
1250 - Would CBQI consider selling shares directly to shareholder?
Then you post you want a big position.
1272 - Now as to the question: Why buy stock directly from the company? Simple. I could not buy the shares I'd like to accumulate by the time the market begins to march without impacting the price of the stock.
But you continue to post selective negative bias. I guess to get a lower cost. Then after being exposed you decide to post yes you are Despy from RB... JF sidekick where you sold out at 1.35 and rebought back in at .75 on bad mouthing the stock.
I do not mind negatives what I do have a problem with is your selective bias and disregard for the truth. Like in your statement I selectively choose to be biased against any stock that costs me 95% though I appreciate unbias negatives I do have a problem with thread disruption, off topic and slective bias that means you are reckless because the truth is not your focus as reflexed in this statement.
It is always best to be non-biased when looking at a security. Truth is I dont comment on several issues because of that. However, my admitted biased has nothing to do with me conducting specific types of analysis on CBQI. I never agreed to conduct APRR and ALRR. But considering the source asking me to make those projections, I am confidant they reflect positively on the company.
You bring all these selective variables but never bring up the whole picture. You know what it will show. Thus to make this statement I have justified reason to delete everyone of your posts for nothing more than thread disruption, which IHUB is a moderated site and COB's can keep the threads clean of disruption, attacks and off topic scenarios. Why you elect not to be forthright and honest is your business. You will always have someone support you regardless of the truth and facts.
BTW I have nothing but time to delete your off topic posts and isruption. I told you enough and I meant it. You want to post with integrity positive or negative that is one thing. TO post for the purpose to disrupt and off topic is another.
CIIR Cash and Options (No you cannot have any of my options either)
ciir
:=) Gary Swancey
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
