InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

wavedreamer

08/17/14 6:56 PM

#238406 RE: Bluefang #238405

Blue,

I think in all the posts I've read of yours this is the most spot on.

Cheers:)
icon url

mymoneybgone

08/17/14 7:07 PM

#238407 RE: Bluefang #238405

Blue, those that have pumped this stock for years don't even have the hope that was dangled from the former management team because that has all been shown to amount to exactly what many of us believed for years- a figment. The facts bear this out, the lacks of sales is my DD on the words before Solms..WBS........

Makes one wonder what was the underlying reason for those companies you mentioned GM,BP, PcW to have selected wave at the time, and why they never moved further.....

icon url

aleajactaest

08/18/14 2:36 AM

#238409 RE: Bluefang #238405

hi blue,

understand the general points.

my post was meant as an assessment of mobile only. i was attempting to explain the development and subsequent ditching of the demo software.

another factoid in my assessment: the speech in which ss said carriers and vendors were not creating a trust model in which companies like wave were able to participate. only the us government could change that, he opined.

put those two things together and maybe one has an explanation why wave chose not to pursue mobile. not much hope of a government intervention.

his negative commentary was usually reliable but always incomplete. which leaves people on the board to fill the gap.

maybe sprague also disapproved of changes to the mobile environment. who knows? solms seems to have cleared up the old timeline argument for wave mobile. it was nowhere. which tells us all a good deal about the view of the horizon from wave's old unsafe harbour.