Followers | 19 |
Posts | 3085 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 06/01/2011 |
Tuesday, May 21, 2013 7:48:15 AM
_____
• On a go-forward basis, I/P Engine is entitled to more—not some 90% less—than the jury’s award for past infringement. Defendants’ contrary position should be rejected.
• Further, Defendants’ alleged design around (allegedly implemented two days before their
opposition) is nothing more than an attempt to hijack I/P Engine’s motion for ongoing royalties.
The Court should reject Google’s attempt to subvert the ongoing royalty issue here and outright reject Defendants’
alleged design-around claim as it is not properly before this Court.
• At the very least, the 20.9% apportionment should apply to the ongoing royalties...
Thanks JJ and All and good luck.
THANKS FOR SHARING!
FEATURED POET and MultiLane Collaborate to Develop High-Speed Pluggable Transceivers for AI Networks • Mar 27, 2024 10:52 AM
Endexx Corporation (EDXC) Leverages Global Market Trends and Legislative Reforms to Spearhead Growth in the Cannabis and Plant-Based Wellness Sectors • EDXC • Mar 27, 2024 3:01 PM
Applied UV, Inc. Announces Pricing of $2.76 Million Registered Direct and Private Placement Priced at the Market Under Nasdaq Rules • AUVI • Mar 27, 2024 2:51 PM
Maybacks Global Entertainment Opens 23 More Stations in Important Major Cities • AHRO • Mar 27, 2024 9:00 AM
NxGen Brands Inc. Forecast to Deliver 140% Growth in Q1 2024 • NXGB • Mar 27, 2024 7:30 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Strategic Advancements: Covert LLC Introduces Federally Legal D9 Gummies and Revamps Innovative eCommerce Platform, Propelling Toward $12 Million Annual Revenue Goal • KGKG • Mar 26, 2024 8:30 AM