InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 309
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/15/2004

Re: None

Saturday, 12/03/2005 1:54:09 PM

Saturday, December 03, 2005 1:54:09 PM

Post# of 51848
Two questions:

1) How many years of data did Hurst analyze to identify and verify the cycles?

2) Is it theoretically possible that the market would bypass a major cycle such as the 80-week low? I know that if all we got was the equivalent of a 5-week low, there would be those tempted to call it the 80-week low, but that would be cheating in my view. An 80-week low where the 4-year cycle is now pointing down should have a fair amplitude to the downside--at least something larger than a 5-week cycle low. So I would expect to see the S&P dip to at least 1220 as a minimum target. So here is what I'm asking: Is it theoretically possible that if the S&P does not exceed 1280 at the high that it would dip no lower than 1250 at the 80-week low? Or is the 80-week so compellingly necessary that we will see that larger dip to 1220 minimum no matter what?

BBelt
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.