Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[DataStream]

The prior art from the NCSoft case was what was submitted to the USPTO as required by law for the prosecution of the additional contingency claims that resulted in 4 additional patents " over" the prior art of the NC Soft case. Which are the very claims being cited in the current litigation against Activision. To infer that the NC Soft prior art was never discussed or considered is incorrect, in fact it was developed by Ropes & Grey the law firm that defended NCSoft and now Activisions lawyers, therefore they have to deal with prior art they dug up and the USPTO has considered and granted patents to WDDD over them.

It is incorrect also to state that Worlds returned any settlement money to NCSoft, that is an unsupportable and false comment.