InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 811
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/09/2012

Re: StockDemiGod post# 21574

Wednesday, 11/28/2012 3:37:27 PM

Wednesday, November 28, 2012 3:37:27 PM

Post# of 68424
steve kim makes a very good point that EXACTLY how the royalty rate is calculated was determined during the trial. This was one of the first things established in the trial and so it would seem the judge does not need to explain it again.

this would also mean that whatever formula Dr Becker applied when he revised his calculations would stand.

I don't think the exact calculations were ever revealed to the public because google had won a suppression on any data relating to their financials, so only the slides and graphs are on public record.

there are 801 documents in the case you can bet at least one of them spells out exactly how Dr Becker came up with his damages numbers.

the trick to these kinds of court cases is to read between the lines because a lot of financial information is commercial in confidence and so will NEVER be made public. (unless of course there is a leak)