I think that may be a mistake by the writer, because the loan they are arguing against is only under the terms of them selling at minimum a portion of the patents for at least 525 million... Unless they are holding the DI patents for licensing and selling a different patent package. I'll have to go back and look. Every single bone they throw us, I find myself going back to re-read the wording closely on something else. Thanks for the article.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.