InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 977
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/30/2009

Re: Phred6 post# 96147

Tuesday, 08/21/2012 12:20:47 AM

Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:20:47 AM

Post# of 118202
Maybe lumnari has a point... I've been in the same boat, something definitive would be great. This post gave me something to mull on.

IMO, as I have worked in a soils lab; the geotextile process is not a "Set it and forget it" system. The soil being processed will constantly change in type and make up; therefore, it will take a constant treatment of the water before entering the geotextile tubes. Example: The amount of clay in the material will affect the efficiency and rate of purging (Realize I have none of the specifics).
Therefore how can you ever say the problem is "solved" when it takes continuous monitoring and adjusting?

If I paid that must for a system to purge water of impurities, it would surely come with a company specialist to make sure it worked properly.

In summary I think worrying about the "water problem" is "Beating a dead horse". Bottom line is how much gold is recovered.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.