Serious, I'm not a premium member so if nlightn or you wish to send me your email address I can provide more information.
I would say though that UMA isn't likely to hurt WiMax and may help in some cases where companies don't have spectrum and want to increase their footprint. They could do this with a WiMax/UMA solution.
FYI, that would not work with ASNAP first, becuase the asnap protocol depends upon the routing at the access point level UMA routes at the network core, and second because I don't believe an asnap endpoint will effectively be able to handle more than a few concurrent calls (if it works at all). A WiMax endpoint in a densely populated area could be handling a thousand concurrent calls and that requires the kind of processing that is not found at hotspots in coffee shops.
If you haven't been reading the CLYW board for a while prepare yourself for an experience. I posted factual information about things that I knew to be true that would have bearing on the success of CLYW. I even went so far as to divulge my identity to the board.
In spite of that, they call me a "basher" whatever that is, and they insist that I'm really an alias for someone else and that I'm paid by some company to try and hurt share price! Seriously. Those guys have been drinking some strange kool-aid.
Good Luck.
Stitch
AI
