Nexus Energy Services Inc (IBGR)

[cheyenne1]

The addition of the words," AND CAN BE EASILY VERIFIED" is a great addition to your post... GOOD JOB.

IMO that would be a game changer for the tone on board. Sort of "mean what you say", or expect shareholders that try and verify and find only deception to ,"say what we mean about findings .

The wasted opportunity to inform current shareholders through letter form,or web page or CC and do the blaming section,not waste PR time on, and then. put out PR in a well thought out manner THAT TOTALLY WAS VERIFIABLE, to new investors as well as current shareholders, is beyond belief for a PUBLIC COMPANY CEO scratching for a better market reaction.

IMO ,as you have said in your post and a well put previous post, the words used in new PR on current activities have little or no weight unless they can be verified.

If its legal from an insider info standpoint now that youve sent it across newswire should be no problem in giving FIRM NAMES .

Public Relations Firm agreement almost "COMPLETED. Say the name of firm if you found it legal enough to confirm on globalnews
wire..that its almost completed.
IF you legally without insider info put it in this PR that "new law firm/auditor has been hired AND FIRM IS NOW FINISHING FINANCIALS, that should be a no brainer to include firms name .
Even the wording "promising funding" with 3 firms for funding "FULLY", im sure would welcome their firm name, advertised accross GLOBALNESWIRE. Thats probably a stretch, but plausable.
For those that researched and verified previous PRs and claims and came up empty of truth, SHOW US VERIFIABLE info on current PR and and if found to be true and valid, im sure many will change posting tone.

Again good phrasing of your post!!
GLTU