RCC Holdings Corp fka RCCH

[mcokpba]

Constant and continual intentional inaccuracies are a tacit admission of the weakness of a position. The palpable nervousness of naked shorts comes across.
___________________________________________
I agree with dominator’s deleted “joy” post 104765.
_______________________________________________
“If the CURRENT CRIMINAL CASE FINDS RCCH GUILTY… “

My comment – Please post/link what “current criminal case” you are addressing.
______________________________________________
....How Much Jail Time?

My comment – Please post where you find “jail time” as part of the remedy sought in your “current criminal case.”

I do not see” jail time” specified in the SEC Gendarme case IF that is YOUR big “current criminal case”. lol. RCCH is listed as a victim in the below listed case. Are you advocating jail time for victims now?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. CIV S-11-0053 KJM-KJN
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,Plaintiff, vs.
GENDARME CAPITAL CORPORATION; et al., Defendants.
_____________________________________________
I Assume RCCH will be Gone….

My comment – Well, you know what they say about people who ASSume
_____________________________________________
…and Everyone will Lose Their Investment in RCCH’s Stock…..

My comment - …. Well, all LONGS will gain from their patience with their investment in RCCH. All naked shorts are going to lose their shirts because of their greedy attempt at manipulating a pink listed stock. So I agree if you meant naked shorts by the term everyone then you are correct EVERY ONE of them will LOSE (big time because of unlimited exposure) their foolish investment because of the shorting of RCCH stock.
______________________________________________
I Hate These Stock Scams! - Don't you?

My comment – YES! Occupy Wall Street.
_______________________________________________
15for2 Thanks for this post # 104765 – Worth reposting.

Companies like RCCH now have a way to get the chill lifted, according to this new SEC ruling:

www.reversemergerblog.com/2012/03/19/sec-orders-dtc-to-adopt-fairness-procedures-on-suspensions/

SEC Orders DTC to Adopt Fairness Procedures on Suspensions
Last Thursday, the SEC ruled In the Matter of the Application of International Power Group, Ltd. for review of action taken by Depository Trust Company or DTC. When the SEC started a case alleging, among other things, sales of unregistered securities by IPG (but neither IPG nor its officers or directors were named), the DTC suspended its electronic trading capability. Two years later the SEC has now ruled.
Essentially, the SEC ruled that IPG is a “person” entitled to a fair and orderly procedure, including a hearing and the opportunity to appeal the matter to the SEC, with respect to the suspension. DTC tried to argue that IPG, since it is not a broker-dealer “participant,” was not a “person.” They also ruled that DTC “did not provide IPG with adequate fair procedure in connection with the suspension.”
More importantly, the Commission also directed DTC to “adopt procedures that accord with the fairness requirements of [the Securities Exchange Act] , which may be applied uniformly in any future such issuer cases.”
This ruling is good news for issuers facing a so-called DTC “chill.” It is now clear they have standing to insist on a proper and fair hearing, and the chance to appeal to the SEC if they are not satisfied.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73506389