Nexus Energy Services Inc (IBGR)

[cheyenne1]

I thought it interesting of why you posted this , as to its reason for posting.

Just words, thats all. Absolutely no validity as far as it relates to progress and rediness.

Package engneering? Look back at late 1990's package. Nothing new whatsover.So its been ready 12-15 years with same packaging. Just not used or produced any packets.

Not one claim made by PHAR has been tested by 3rd party for validity, not someones word taking a sample, but FDA validated testing at a facility that checks for lies about claims on a product.

What is quality control research completed? What play on words is that?
That is a part of FDA inspection and validity. HOWARD will have to have in place all the detailed QC regs. and personell specifically trained and will have to be approved and in place before operation. Complete logging of every process and testing with documentation done by trained QC..THIS CANT BE COMPLETED .

The research means nothing for current rediness, any inhouse testing means nothing as far as current rediness, package enginnering shouldnt be news as its the same pack with same retro looking wording from years back.
If the QC research refers to learning from this ( link below) then hopefully just words or trying to operate in a half ass manner wont cut it.
WORDS are just that until CEO shows he has the ability to back up these words and they can be validated.

http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/1997/UCM066003.pdf