InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1023
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2011

Re: Snizzle post# 23933

Sunday, 02/26/2012 12:48:55 PM

Sunday, February 26, 2012 12:48:55 PM

Post# of 95629
Yea really is an issue. The issue is just like past 2 private attempts that took private investors money WHAT HAPPENED, WHY?
What makes this attempt different when business model being operated the same.

MAYBE YOU DONT CARE. Proud for you.

But HOWARD/PHAR pulling the old "THIRD PARTY" trick so as not to pay for services seems to be a "pattern" starting for this CEO. Remember awareness program, same old excuse HOWARD conviently used.. For the example of past business practices, and now failing to pay for services rendered PATTERN is whats obvious, PATTERN IS A KEY ISSUE, like it or not... Better yet, admitt it or not.
Howard has no problem with putting outright lies in PRs, what makes you think he is not doing same in these non payment for services rendered pattern..He is brave enough to send fraud PRs out to REUTERS, MARKETWIRE so he is brave enough to stage the innocent victim on this and never bat an eye, Getting good, i must admitt. Bad thing is here, GOOD means HORRIBLE.

The part nobody really gives a rats as_ is what demon in the PHAR stable of characters in this tangled web he uses . Tommy one time, Tabor next, Kit Chambers next, Monty Waldman, Joe Pittera. Roger Crabb, D,McLaughlin

Bottom line ,like it or , A true proffessionl CEO would not be involved with the group thats teaching him PINKSCAM 101, and ill be dam_ if PHARs CEO HOWARD has made honor roll thus PHAR.


Good day GLTA