InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 88
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/26/2005

Re: wiredog post# 15727

Tuesday, 08/02/2005 6:26:47 AM

Tuesday, August 02, 2005 6:26:47 AM

Post# of 60938
Wiredog, please do a better job verifying what you say before you post. Your statement that CLYW is protected by virtue of a process patent that describes "THE METHOD" of switching between WiFi and Cellular networks belies a significant misunderstanding of the nature of this type of patent.

In fact, because the patent relies on a method or process, rather than on a specific physical invention that can be physically examined and thus compared to other technology that might possibly infringe upon it, a process patent must be exactingly descriptive with exceptional specificity and minute detail in order to withstand a challenge posed by a physical device that could conceivably represent an infringement.

After all, with the device available for review, CLYW must prove that their exact process has been duplicated. How can this be if the process was never clearly defined?

-Stitch



Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.