Wiredog, please do a better job verifying what you say before you post. Your statement that CLYW is protected by virtue of a process patent that describes "THE METHOD" of switching between WiFi and Cellular networks belies a significant misunderstanding of the nature of this type of patent.
In fact, because the patent relies on a method or process, rather than on a specific physical invention that can be physically examined and thus compared to other technology that might possibly infringe upon it, a process patent must be exactingly descriptive with exceptional specificity and minute detail in order to withstand a challenge posed by a physical device that could conceivably represent an infringement.
After all, with the device available for review, CLYW must prove that their exact process has been duplicated. How can this be if the process was never clearly defined?
-Stitch