InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
4,967.23
(
-0.88%
)
US TECH 100
16,556.80
(
-2.24%
)
Dow Jones
37,986.40
(
0.56%
)
Brent Oil
86.63
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
63,819.60
(
-0.01%
)
Post# of 220579
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

MrPics

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 28
Posts 3902
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/31/2011

MrPics

Re: None

Wednesday, 02/08/2012 3:45:26 PM

Wednesday, February 08, 2012 3:45:26 PM

Post# of 220579
How does the Fraudulent Interstate Transactions section 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 apply to the the HDogTX.com paid promotional campaign of FBCD and the subsequent posting on social media sites without proper disclosures during said campaign?

http://hdogtx.com/Disclaimer.html

http://taft.law.uc.edu/CCL/33Act/sec17.html

Are there any statues which an investor can use to get full disclosure of the party who paid HDogTX.com for the campaign?

Reference:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=71840916
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up