InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1023
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/11/2011

Re: surfguy post# 23018

Thursday, 02/02/2012 1:27:23 PM

Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:27:23 PM

Post# of 95629
Hey Surguy, since the conversational topic of the day is about these issues about PHAR i would like to weigh in , in a simular fashion as others. But i agree, postering back in forth just clouding the real issue.
I think the relevence of Howards past PRIVATE venture to get AQUAPRIN to market and the present attempt to get AQUAPRIN to market carry tremendous weight for this subject spoken of so much today, AS BEING VERY RELEVENT to post about.
The private one carried a serious FDA warning well after start of Company, so the rules were known ,just not followed. Financially it ended in full chapter 7 bankruptcy. Lot of vendors ,investors suffer.
Its all about relevency to determine are some of these traits still here 15yrs later and showing up as part of PHAR plummeting market value.
Issues on sample products IMO skirts what code of ethics the FDA counts on. Financial situation is heading to same point, only difference is some funding options available by going public and you dont have a BANK or PRIVATE investor screaming for their money,,you just have investors not knowing where their money went.

But IMO PHAR is not attracting funding, they are scaring it off by operating in such non transparent manner.
Always appreciate you reply