InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,738.17
(
-0.13%
)
US TECH 100
19,436.00
(
-0.73%
)
Dow Jones
42,313.00
(
0.33%
)
Brent Oil
72.01
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
65,667.95
(
-0.31%
)
Post# of 358496
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

needdiamonds

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 12
Posts 9341
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/17/2005

needdiamonds

Re: jimmym4 post# 332741

Friday, 01/06/2012 9:55:16 PM

Friday, January 06, 2012 9:55:16 PM

Post# of 358496
He will not get that far. Will be thrown out again.

Also

You did not answer the second part. The SEC states that even if there was a Hidden Trust Payout (which there is not) Al and his few defendants are not the viable payees. The only one who would be is the company. How do you explain away this logic? Or how does Al?

Because if AL is correct. He should give the info direct to Frizzle with a NDA. Then The company who would be entitled to such a payout could receive it. Then they could decide to post a DIVI to all shareholders.

Taking the gamble of not getting to trial because you withhold info is dangerous if not illegal.

Thank You

PS See KINGPIN I can ask nice no judgmental questions


My posts are just my opinions. It should be taken as such..

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up