InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 72
Posts 1568
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/05/2009

Re: Bluzie2 post# 5440

Saturday, 12/31/2011 12:55:05 PM

Saturday, December 31, 2011 12:55:05 PM

Post# of 8307

Wall_Street - are you still leaning to Class 18? I'd love to hear your thoughts.



Yes, unchanged.

This is a flip-of-the-coin deal and debtors always enjoy home field advantage.

60-40-0, 18, 12, 21 respectively

While congress created 510(b) because of common equity holders, in that they were the class that was most likely to try to boot strap their way over preferreds or other higher priority classes to reach the level of general unsecureds, it also applies to every other security that may try to inch up the priority ladder for the reasons set forth (ambiguously) in the language contained in the statute.

Even if a debt security that is higher in priority than general unsecureds wins a derivative claim based on their security, that claim will be subordinated to general unsecureds if the situation fits 510(b). 510(b) works both ways. In other words, a debt security in this situation would be paid according to priority in the waterfall, then lower classes are paid including general claims, then that debt security's derivative claim would be paid, if there was such a situation, in class 18 as we have here.

The tranquility claim actually makes me lean more toward 18. But it is what it is and we'll know soon enough.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.