InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 69
Posts 12025
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/01/2009

Re: Lucky Loser post# 8096

Monday, 12/19/2011 12:37:06 PM

Monday, December 19, 2011 12:37:06 PM

Post# of 163722
You are probably quite right. They sure must have known the final terms of the transfer agreement at least about a week before that Nov15 date and it seems very likely to me that the high trading volumes of the week Nov 8-Nov18 may have been due to them shorting the stock to take advantage of the 0.6-0.67 prices while the going was good. Actually the daily average of those 7 days (=574k/day) was about 3x as high as that of the preceeding week (Nov1-Nov8= 180k/day)

Nov 18 646,600 0.58
Nov 17 405,200 0.59
Nov 16 359,500 0.53
Nov 15 419,300 0.59
Nov 14 57,000 0.62
Nov 11 389,600 0.67
Nov 10 580,500 0.67
Nov 9 290,800 0.63
Nov 8 869,100 0.67

If the difference in daily trading average volume of 574k-180k=394k/day was really due to them, then they may have shorted about 2.76m shares in those Nov8-Nov18 days at an avg price of about 0.63/sh. Now they can merrily cover those shares at sub 0.40/sh ??? Rinse repeat until Mar 01 ...

If I were them, I would probably have done it too.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.