But, that may apply to the previous guy Salamon, which means that I would have to revert back to the most recent 10Q which said
In which case, MM paying himself $10,000 a month. Now that I think about it, the $10k is probably right but here's the problem. Whether it's $10,000 a month or $15K, it's just plain wrong for a CEO to arbitrarily pay himself $10,000 or more a month as CEO of an empty company with no money, no assets, no revenues simply because he could.
So, if it's $10,000 a month MM is paying himself instead of the $15k, then I am sorry for the error. I took that guy's word for it and should have looked further but it doesn't change the point.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.