Golden Triangle Ventures Inc (GTVH)

[$A-Train]

BNPD/TXOM now domiciled in NV....good standing in the state of NV... most likely using a DBA in TX. Tom Gouger has been doing business in different states for going on 40 years, I'm sure he has this one under control as well.

Closing leases even though they are not allowed to do business in the state of TX...ok.

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=48043387


I'm pretty sure we are good to move forward, will have oil in barrels any day now, new acquisitions and more leases to make the company continue to grow going forward. Just want to make sure my opinion is understood here in hopes of having a balanced discussion.....


BigBake1 Share Friday, July 15, 2011 6:49:28 PM
Re: Salad post# 26692 Post # of 27266

In the same vein are we not here to share the DD, both the good and the Bad? Is that not what balanced discussion is?





BigBake1 Share Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:54:37 PM
Re: matoutus post# 27271 Post # of 27277

There is no registration on file, it is required to register, show proof of registration that they have in fact complied with the SOS. It is real simple, support the statement with a link. They are currently not in good standing with the state of Texas and they were in fact domiciled there. Your argument has no support, it is just an opinion statement with nothing backing it.







BigBake1 Share Tuesday, July 19, 2011 10:02:10 PM
Re: matoutus post# 27250 Post # of 27260

But they were in fact domiciled in the State of Texas which they are not in good standing, the Nevada domicile holds not weight for operating as they are in fact not operating. Like I though no support for such statements, but hey feel free to keep looking at that link of Not In Good Standing in the State of Texas, that is supporting a statement. Might want to look up the laws of out of state corporations and the requirements to file in order to operate in the state of Texas, also a supported statement.







BigBake1 Share Tuesday, July 19, 2011 9:52:42 PM
Re: matoutus post# 27244 Post # of 27260

No they are not operating, but please do supply the proof of operation, I am certain some would be interested in this fact that you are trying to provide currently without support. But they were domiciled in Texas which they are no longer in good standing, the same state that requires them to file to operate which they haven't and cannot until they are in good standing. So all they operate right now is a paper mill for share printing and it appears plenty of those have issued.






BigBake1 Share Tuesday, July 19, 2011 9:44:28 PM
Re: matoutus post# 27237 Post # of 27260

But they are not in good standing in Texas where the were originally domiciled before two months ago. They operate in Texas which requires them by law to file in order to operate, they cannot operate until they file, and they certainly will not be filing until they are in good standing. So the Nevada thing is all nice but fails to address the fact that this company cannot operate until they are in good standing Texas.








BigBake1 Share Tuesday, July 19, 2011 9:21:25 PM
Re: matoutus post# 27234 Post # of 27260

TEXAS OIL & MINERALS INC is Not In Good Standing with the State of Texas

https://ourcpa.cpa.state.tx.us/coa/servlet/cpa.app.coa.CoaGetTp?Pg=tpid&Search_Nm=Texas%20Oil%20&Button=search&Search_ID=17604210264









BigBake1 Share Tuesday, July 19, 2011 8:48:36 PM
Re: matoutus post# 27216 Post # of 27261

Right, but they were domiciled in Texas until two months ago, so the only misleading statement is the ommission of the previous domicile and the no longer good standing there. It is relevant information as to how this company operates, further they still have yet to file to operate in Texas as required by law. But we already know that cannot happen since they are not in good standing with the state of Texas.








BigBake1 Share Tuesday, July 19, 2011 6:06:30 PM
Re: Salad post# 27204 Post # of 27261

Right but he is also the same person that allowed this company to no longer be in good standing with the state of Texas, you know the state this company was domiciled in originally before two months ago getting domiciled in Nevada. Texas the state that he ha so far failed to file with since he is planning to operate in that state. Of course if all he is really going to do is sell paper shares he does not have to file with the state of Texas.






BigBake1 Share Monday, July 18, 2011 8:24:32 AM
Re: matoutus post# 27066 Post # of 27262

Right, but what state were they domiciled in before Nevada just two mnths ago? Was it Texas? You know the state they are no longer in good standing with. The one that shows a longterm record as opposed to just two months. I do believe they also operate in Texas and have yet to meet state law requirements to file there.







BigBake1 Share Friday, July 15, 2011 7:11:19 PM
Re: Risicare post# 26701 Post # of 27263

Ahhh crap, looks like someone is not conducting their business with the applicable state laws in which they plan to operate their business.







BigBake1 Share Friday, July 15, 2011 7:11:19 PM
Re: Risicare post# 26701 Post # of 27263

Ahhh crap, looks like someone is not conducting their business with the applicable state laws in which they plan to operate their business.






BigBake1 Share Friday, July 15, 2011 6:53:38 PM
Re: matoutus post# 26690 Post # of 27264

So what you are saying is that Texas Oil and Mineral was never domiciled in Texas? So which state were they domiciled in before the last two months in Nevada? You know, the one that actually establishes a trend for one to check upon the history of it's previous operations for solid DD.






BigBake1 Share Friday, July 15, 2011 6:21:07 PM
Re: matoutus post# 26685 Post # of 27267

So are you saying that Texas Oil and Mineral was not domiciled in the State of Texas? Once again a couple of months of being domiciled in Nevada cannot establish a history, one mustvlook for a longer trend to base decisions upon.






BigBake1 Share Friday, July 15, 2011 6:17:37 PM
Re: matoutus post# 26679 Post # of 27268

So you are saying that Texas Oil and Mineral was never domiciled in Texas? The good standing in Nevada is just months old, not relevant data for one to make financial decisions from. The history of the long term domicile speaks loudly, not in good standing thus why they had to choose another State for incorporation.






BigBake1 Share Friday, July 15, 2011 10:19:32 AM
Re: matoutus post# 26632 Post # of 27270

That is not misleading it is in fact the history of this company before it reverse merger into this shell which they then domiciled into Nevada. it is a fact that Texas Oil and Mineral is not a company in good standing where they currently operate and have been operating for years. It is a fact that the CEO has a lien against him for past business for a couple hundred thousand dollars. All factual and all pertinent information that is used to determine corporate image.






BigBake1 Share Friday, July 15, 2011 9:18:12 AM
Re: Kinzhok43 post# 26617 Post # of 27271

Yet it has a history of bad standing in the state it currently operates in, not hard to understand why it is being brought up. Just like the Lien owed by the CEO for a couple hundred thousand dollars, all relevant to the operational history of the company.