InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 231
Posts 2554
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/19/2003

Re: remmy post# 315453

Wednesday, 06/29/2011 4:28:55 PM

Wednesday, June 29, 2011 4:28:55 PM

Post# of 734615
yes, frankly I was surprised at the time, that more discovery wasn't allowed, but I watched her being amazed, surprised to the point of blatant ridicule almost, all the while reading the monitor. So, I presume that she was simultaneously listening and reading the current or prior motion (or both) to gauge the overlap between the two...called the break to give further thought to that and then came back to rule having decided that the EC already had everything they requested, and hence everything they presumably needed, with the exception of the Aurelius piece, which she granted.

The three other hedgies attorneys were a bit disgusted with the proceeding, when it came to the TPS motion. All however, were armed with much emotion today. I don't think they were relieved about a potential outcome being certain, just about being able to report back to their clients that they didn't have to do all the work of gathering the requested docs and email.

However, JMW asked repeatedly of each attorney to reiterate that all docs had been delivered, that all internal communication had been delivered, etc...this may trip one of them up in the trial, if it comes out that wasn't so, and in fact, Eckstein, of Aurelius, tried really hard to tap dance, although she wasn't buying it, and came back and changed a bit of his statement...in my mind, because he realized the box he had put not only himself, but his clients in.

One quick anecdote...when Ed handed out the redacted report, the entire front page was blacked out. JMW laughed, and even BR was laughing about how ridiculous that was! Pretty funny today, even without Art in attendance :)
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News