InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 96
Posts 9115
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2011

Re: HammerheadZ post# 11485

Wednesday, 06/15/2011 1:18:36 AM

Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:18:36 AM

Post# of 20669
Why do some investors keep providing links to sites that are paid to say good things for and about InoLife Technologies and any other company that even a "third party" can pay them to say?
Some paid sites that did a release about INOL even use the term "apocryphal" when talking about the info. that they printed in the news alert about INOL.

They even say in their "disclaimers" and/or "TOU, TOS that the info. provided by the payer is not guarenteed to be accurate and that they may have a position in the company and may sell theirs at anytime.

These "services" can even print stories of INOL being shorted and they have a legal out because of what they write in their disclaimers, TOU and TOS.

Seems to me with all the bookkeeping,regulations, documentation and all the other requirements to short a stock that CAN BE shorted such as "listed and OTC" which INOL is neither. Seems like INOL was taken off the OTC when it was downgraded with the changes that were made a little while back. Wasn't it?

The manipulation that I see is the dilution of INOL shares by all the consulting companies and the dilution by Gary so he can draw his salary. He has bills to pay just like the rest of us.

Good luck investing if you believe what you read at ANY of the paid advertising sites! They accept money and/or shares in any company to print anything from ANYBODY.