InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 387
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/04/2008

Re: Dumerthanmost post# 3031

Wednesday, 01/12/2011 9:46:03 PM

Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:46:03 PM

Post# of 8307
The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s “Notice of Submission,” filed this date, in which plaintiff states that the following three motions “have been fully briefed and are ripe for resolution” by the court: (1) plaintiff’s motion for correction of award of mitigation damages; (2) plaintiff’s motion for award of a tax gross-up, pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”); and (3) defendant’s motion to dismiss this matter for lack of jurisdiction, pursuant RCFC 12(b)(1). The court notes that a fourth motion, defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s bill of costs, is also pending before the court.
In light of defendant’s RCFC 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss, it is ORDERED that ALL OTHER PENDING MOTIONS, though fully briefed, are not ripe for resolution and ARE hereby STAYED. The court will schedule oral argument on defendant’s RCFC 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss in the near future.
s/Lawrence J. Block
Lawrence J. Block
Judge Case 1:95-cv-00039-LB Document 343 Filed 01/07/11 Page 1 of 1
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.