InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[jaykayjones]

Jim & Dave

Nokia's answering brief (against dismissal) was due on 3/29; it's been extended to 4/28. Does the delay mean anything? Don't know, probably not. JMO, JK

 
 03/15/2005	11	 OPENING BRIEF in Support re 10 MOTION  
 to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter  
 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1),  
 12(B)(6), and 12(H)(3) filed by Interdigital Communications  
 Corporation, Interdigital Technology Corporation.Answering  
 Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/29/2005.  
 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Nos. 1-3# 2 Exhibit Nos. 4-6)(Moore,  
 David) (Entered: 03/15/2005) 
  
 03/23/2005	12	STIPULATION set forth briefing  
 scheduling re 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction  
 Over the Subject Matter Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil  
 Procedure 12(B)(1), 12(B)(6), and 12(H)(3) by Nokia  
 Corporation, Nokia Inc., Interdigital Communications  
 Corporation, Interdigital Technology Corporation. (Blumenfeld,  
 Jack) (Entered: 03/23/2005) 
  
 03/23/2005	 	SO ORDERED, re 12 Stipulation filed by  
 Interdigital Technology Corporation, Nokia Corporation, Nokia  
 Inc., Interdigital Communications Corporation, Set Briefing  
 Schedule: Answering Brief due 4/28/2005. Reply Brief due  
 5/12/2005. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 03/23/05.  
 (afb, ) (Entered: 03/24/2005)