InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[Corp_Buyer]

"The ICC informed the Tribunal. Why?" - Loop, very interesting observation that the Tribunal needed guidance (or ruling or direction) from the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

Is there another reading or possible explanation to wit: Nok may have already elevated (or internally appealed) the panel's refusal to wait until after the UK 2G action is decided so that Nok's non-use of IDCC's technology argument could be fully considered by the panel under the "all relevant factors" clause?

In other words, NOK may already be crying foul against the panel and have elevated their arguments to the ICC "Court of Arbitration"?

Rather than a requested delay by the parties for settlement talks, perhaps Nok is already maneuvering on some of their appeal issues?

In any case, it does seem IMO to be an indicator that IDCC may have effectively prevailed on excluding the 2G non-use technical argument of Nok.

TIA,
Corp_Buyer