InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 4681
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/07/2006

Re: Stock_Barber post# 73811

Wednesday, 06/23/2010 8:37:18 AM

Wednesday, June 23, 2010 8:37:18 AM

Post# of 103340

I strongly suspect that most board readers have made up their minds on this *issue*...



I agree, but I also agree that the board readers whom you refer to, own less then 100 million shares. The majority of shareholders again do not pay any attention to this board or any board.

Never in my life have I seen such a sick display of lying and ridiculous claims being made.



Again I agree wholeheartedly! You were talking about these psots referencing lavish spending, dilution for personal gains, no such thing as NSS and of course my favorite, the company is consistantly loosing money!

The bottom line here is this is a scam company with a scam "ex" ceo that is losing money and diluting.



Prime example of your observation from above, how do you know the company is a "scam", the ex ceo is a scam and again the company is loosing money!

if shorting is not present here, and all facts support that... what would be the motive? I personally am at a loss to explain it...


Without any FTD's your opinion is incorrect... there can be no short position... *or* someone please explain how a short position can exist without any FTDs?



The above statement is based on the following....

1. All MM's are 100% honest and report everything!(I have a hard time believing that!....
2. your facts are based on a believe the government is properly regulating and doing their job instead of watching "porn sites"
3. "shorting is not present"...."facts support that"...then why can you find thousands of examples by just doing a "google" search of examples where it happens everyday?
4.FTD's are all reported...yea right!...this is Wall
Street!...you just can not make this stuff up....

I am sure you are aware of all of the above...

Plus when a large broker like TDA can stop handling "buys" on EXPH and all they can and will tell their clients is the following:

The business decision not to allow opening transactions for EXPH is made after careful review and while I am not able to go into details, please be assured that it is done with the client's best interests at heart together with those of the firm and the industry. It is something not required of us by any regulators but its a proactive measure on our part to help preserve the integrity of the markets.




IMO...it is done with their best client's best interests at heart together with those of the firm and the industry.

Remember this statement:It is something not required of us by any regulators

Sorry but I tend to believe 4k and those pros you can google who state this occurs everyday with the help of brokes and marketmakers along with hedgefund clients and other large clients.


GoodLuck and GoodTrading

Gambler